2023-05-30 QC Meeting Notes

Participants

  • Ben Pritchard

  • @David Dotson

  • @Jeffrey Wagner

Goals

  • Updates on MolSSI QCFractal

    • status of new server, migration timeline

    • plans for training on dataset submission, actioning compute

  • Updates from OpenFF

    • status of OpenFF server; response on grant supplement?

    • new personnel; timeline on onboarding

  • User questions

    • existing dataset issues

    • new submission issues

Discussion topics

Item

Notes

Item

Notes

Updates from MolSSI

  • new server is in (physically present, not racked)

  • networking in place; hoping to get server racked next week

  • now focusing on how to configure the host

  • migration

    • will perform data migration in parallel to other setup

    • no firm timeline on migration start/completion

  • DD: plans for training on new client?

    • BP: general docs for how to work with datasets, records in place; still need dataset-type-specific record docs

  • DD – Had trouble with timeouts before

    • BP - Those will continue for large single requests. But I could make it so you would be able to submit large datasets in chunks (either automatically or manually).

  • DD – On behalf of PEastman, would you be comfortable with MolSSI QCA hosting SPICE, while the OFF QCA would have torsiondrives and such?

    • BP – Could do that, OFF and MolSSI QCAs could be colocated on the same host, but it is easier if neither one is huge. Otherwise we’ll need a DB admin.

    • DD – If OpenFF does get its own hardware, question is where the SPICE sets should go - Would those stay on the MolSSI server, or would those need to go to OpenFF’s instance?

    • BP – These do fit in with the NIH grant (which OpenFF is party to) - That does mention dataset generation and implies hosting. The new server will have about 150TB space after RAID.

    • DD – If Peter wants to regenerate dataset, that could increase size/compute footprint.

Updates from OpenFF

  • DD: response on supplement?

    • JW: no response yet; adding to lead team agenda

    • DD: submitted in Feb, so imagine we would have a response by now (May)

  • DD: new QC personnel?

    • JW: hired two QC people, one of them is from the QC supplement, one of them starts early July

      • other one starts early August

      • Lily and new project manager will onboard them to organization

    • BP: as for what they can do, a lot that can be done to expand the user-side of QCFractal

      • working on the client functionality, ease of use for applications, etc.

      • JW: will start a DM with BP, Mobley, Lily; can put together timelines and what’s needed

      • BP: interested in e.g. chaining calculations (optimization followed by single point, optimization followed by optimization, etc.)

        • also SMILES-based submission, better interfacing with the chemist’s view of what a molecule is

    • DD: who will they formally report to?

      • JW: believe they will both report to Lily, though one is funded from industry and the other from the NIH joint grant

  • BP: do intend to have the new server with next up and running by the time new hires are onboarded

    • DD: excellent, that’s ideal

New datasets

  • JW: DNA datasets may be coming next, but not imminently (certainly not in next 3 months); work on rosemary ongoing (amino acids)

Action items

@David Dotson will pursue answer from @John Chodera on NIH equipment supplement; need response from NIH

Decisions

Â