2023-11-15 FF Fitting Meeting

Participants

  • @Trevor Gokey

  • @Lily Wang

  • @Christopher Bayly

  • @Brent Westbrook (Unlicensed)

  • @Pavan Behara

  • @David Mobley

  • @Lee-Ping Wang

  • @Chapin Cavender

  • @Matt Thompson

  • @David Mobley

  • @Willa Wang

  • @Simon Boothroyd

  • @Alexandra McIsaac

Goals

  •  

Discussion topics

Item

Presenter

Notes

Item

Presenter

Notes

 

Lily

  • Only optgeo targets were incorrect, with multiple confs

  • Conformers beyond first had incorrect charges

  • Atom reordering between charges

  • CB: Omega changed and reordering may be an issue as well; default behavior was to reorder. We have fixed this at OE and made a test

  • DM: So Omega will reorder atoms?

  • CB: If you don’t set the flag, then yes it will reorder. In a new version of Omega, this flag was not set anymore.



Simon

  • Expensive part is MM optimization

  • LP: We use optimization because e.g. protein FF, after fitting the FF would go where no data is, and we would get weird structures

    • Solution was to adding new conformations/data and rerunning FB to fit. After about 3 cycles things worked

    • Optimization was introduced to preempt this issue, hopefully

  • LP: After the parsley fit, things were a bit rushed and settings might have been baked into future fits

  • CC: I see the same; it seems like the protein fits are affected by earlier fits

  • SB: Where did the intial data come from for protein fits?

  • LP: Used torsion drives and hessians

  • CB: Energy is dominated by stiff dof, but the soft dof is important. Fitting to just energies might affect this



Action items

Decisions

Â