Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Current »

The RMSD differences seen in a fit with a bunch of parameters being fit simultaneously are not so prevalent in case of a single parameter refit, only two cases that show a higher rmsd even with good agreement in energies are 1762057, 21540333, rest all are negligible differences.


RMSD plots of the MM minimized structures wrt the QM initial geometries for the following force fields:

For context, TIG5 - [#6X3:1]~[#7X3:2]-!@[#6X3:3]~@[#6:4] is a subset of t69 - [*:1]~[#7X3,#7X2-1:2]-!@[#6X3:3]~[*:4], and the following force fields are trained on targets from substituted phenyl set.

tig5_interpolated: introducing TIG5 as a new interpolated parameter in 1.3.0 and placing it below t69

tig5_general: introducing TIG5 as a general torsion parameter in 1.3.0

t69_ general: refitting t69 in 1.3.0 on substituted phenyl

t69_interpolated: converting t69 to an interpolated parameter in 1.3.0

off_130_substituted_phenyl_updated: Openff-1.3.0 parameters [t43, t47, t69, t72, t74, t96, t97] refit on substituted phenyl set to have parity in comparison with the interpolated fits

QCA TD ID

tig, 1.3.0, 1.3.0

ELF10 WBO

Chemical Structure

Relative energies

RMSD

1762057

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

0.961125

21540333

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

0.977699

21272391

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

0.948766

1762659

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

1.001833

1762791

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

1.009216

1762058

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

0.957823

21272373

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

0.937321

21540298

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

0.981915

1762550

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

0.966336

1762139

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

0.992143

1762660

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

1.027414

1762121

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

0.982741

1762789

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

0.979623

1762781

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

1.022455

1762532

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

1.040534

1762151

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

1.010008

1762411

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

0.970049

1762406

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

1.015252

1762055

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

0.987194

1762056

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

0.988277

1762115

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

0.991034

1762656

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

0.996707

1762530

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

1.025111

21272353

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

0.959415

21540728

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

0.973745

1762389

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

0.979855

1762410

(TIG5, TIG5, t69, t69int, t69, t69)

1.012120

FF

Obj. fn value on the training set (44 targets) of tig5 only fit with different forcefields

tig5_interpolated

176.38

tig5_general

204.51

t69_interpolated

190.34

t69_general

203.66

Off_1.3.0_trained_on_substituted_phenyl -
0th iter

214.64

  • No labels