2024-04-12 OpenFF/FE collab

Participants

  • @Matt Thompson

  • @Richard Gowers

Goals

  • check in on validation of AFE Protocol

Discussion topics

Item

Presenter

Notes

Item

Presenter

Notes

last week’s notes

 

https://openforcefield.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/MEET/pages/2842132492

solvent padding

 

  • openff solvent padding definition is different to openmm/openfe

    • openff has more padding added for a given stated padding value (padding distance + a little bit of ligand size)

    • all values are above cutoff, so this is an inefficiency rather than a scientific concern

  • will raise as something to document better in openfe docstrings

cutoffs



  • nb switching function in openfe code path looks different

    • openfe has distance=-1, useSwitchingFunction=0

    • openff has distance=0.9, useSwitchingFunction=1 (presumably on)

    • action: associated issues raised in openfe repo by MT

  • nb cutoff seems to get set to 1.0 (with no switching)

    • should be switching at 0.8 to real cutoff at 0.9

    • this is probably scientifically fine, but is another inefficiency

    • action: issue to get raised in skunkworks?

    • put a print statement somewhere on the OpenFF → OpenFE passoff to see if the 10.0 A cutoff is set by OpenFF (right out of Interchange) or OpenFE code (maybe a consequence of some FE setting being applied after)

ongoing work

 

  • chosen this as test molecule: COC(=O)c1ccccc1

  • RG running back to back AFEs of this

  • MT still writing comparison codes

  • MT wrote code path for non-water solvation via packmol/interchange

 

 

 

Action items

Decisions