Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Current »

Participants

Discussion topics

Item

Notes

benchmarks of QM theory, implicit solvent models &QCA interface

  • (CA presents)

  • (see recording)

  • PB – Is the rinicker model DASH? I see charge sloshing with that for larger mols.

    • DC – I don’t think it’s DASH, but we can double check.

  • CA – Have other people had issues with psi4 and implicit solvent and DZVP? We’ve had trouble with PCM.

    • DC – Yeah, this was released in psi4 a few months ago, but it seems to be a bit buggy.

    • WZW – PCM has a well known issue where it rolls a probe along the molecular surface, but this means that small changes in geo can lead to big changes in retults. ORCA solved this by describing surface using gaussians.

    • CA – …

    • (see recording ~22 mins)

    • CA – SCF seemed to go wrong with larger basis sets.

    • DC – Should check whether there are any recommended basis sets.

  • JW – I’m not sure that we have implicit solvent work happening at OpenFF. Can anyone speak to whether the stack even currently works?

    • (no response)

    • JH – I’m doing some related work to support implicit solvent in QCEngine . Yeah, we can submit this as a test.

Implicit solvent and electrostatics datasets

DC –

Action items

  •  

Decisions

  • No labels