Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

Participants: David Mobley Hyesu Jang Lee-Ping Wang Christopher Bayly Daniel Smith (Deactivated) Jessica Maat (Deactivated)

Discussion:

DLM: Quantify diversity using graph similarity then eventually incorporate WBO

CB: LINGOs - graph based similarity based on the SMILES string (Citation to LINGOs method: Link)

DLM: Why should we use LINGOs versus graph fingerprint similarity?

CB: We used smiles for everything, might be simpler. Links to data representation to clustering. Graph similarity is better for 2D similarity.

DLM: Then let’s proceed with graph fingerprint similarity.

DLM: We have Bayers patented collection and has higher similarity within its data set to the other data sets.

DS: We are running 1000 torsion drives for Silicon Therapeutics in QCA. It could be a good data set to use for upcoming fitting, although we might want to consider running Fragmenter on the data set.

DLM: We should consider updating the training data set for future releases.

  • No labels