Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this content. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Version History
« Previous
Version 3
Next »
Participants
Goals
Discussion topics
Item | Presenter | Notes |
---|
Review fitting strategy | Chapin Cavender | Charges Lennard-Jones Valence and torsions Fit Sage types (null model) or new protein-specific torsions Target Sage QC training dataset and new QC datasets Optimization dataset for capped 1-mers TorsionDrives on (phi, psi) and (chi1, chi2) for capped 1-mers
Fit torsions/valence simultaneously or sequentially
|
Rosemary benchmark - small molecules | Chapin Cavender | |
Rosemary benchmark - proteins | Chapin Cavender | All trajectories in triplicate Force fields Need Rosemary/TIP3P Rosemary/OPC Amber ff14SB/TIP3P
Want Amber ff14SB/OPC CHARMM36m/TIP3P Amber ff19SB/OPC a99SB-disp TIP4P-D
Beauchamp/Pande dataset 32 small peptides (2 to 5 residues) Chemical shifts and scalar couplings 500 ns trajectories Use as validation dataset to choose between models for protein torsions
Need: Robustelli/Shaw a99SB-disp dataset Want: Mao/Montelione dataset 41 folded proteins Chemical shifts and NOEs 10 μs trajectories
Aggregate sampling
|
Compute for protein benchmarks | Jeffrey Wagner | Talked to SB - If protein observable benchmark sims will be run on F@H, there’s little benefit to having the analysis implemented in Evaluator. So we’ll want to think about which repo we could keep the submission, trajectory pulldown, and analysis scripts in, and how that will be reproducible (record software versions etc)
|
Action items
Decisions
Add Comment