| |
|---|
Update Dataset Tracking | Project Board; Slides |
QDS handling of non-QCSubmit dataset. | Both Scaffold Validation and Scaffold Submission PRs are completed and ready for review |
Update on clean force field releases | QDS Submissions Decision on Zenodo Authors? Need QCADS SOP PR reviewed Need Zenodo Sage 2.0.0 - 2.2.0 entries reviewed |
Clean benchmark releases | Need script to filter Industry benchmark, I’ll do the rest with the release Danny Cole gave a few datasets that I’m not sure what to do with. Slides JW – I think these should each be separate zenodo entries LW – Largely agree, with the exception that making a 1.1 verison of MLPepper with everything combined would be good.
I can go to the Newcastle check in tomorrow to discuss. |
psi4_utilities | |
MolSSI Info / Align Priorities on MolSSI Asks | 2025-05-27 QCArchive User Meeting; No notes from June 10th meeting New from last QCAUM meeting: (5/27) Dataset lock was discussed. Ben thinks it would be easy to implement but there was discussion on whether it was worth the time needed. (6/10) Discussed the future of our data hosted by MolSSI and action items to ensure continuity. Worst case scenario options include: We get a full copy of postgreSQL database (5TB) and host on our own server QCFractal updates to allow for copying from a database on one server to a database on another server (with or without dataset-view intermediates). This is complicated with reindexing records.
Requests: Ben has recognized receiving my benchmarking notebook but hasn’t gotten to looking into how to speed up record access. I ran a notebook to benchmark the disparity between iterating over entries and records to make a case to Ben that the latter is prohibitive. It takes an order of magnitude longer to iterate through records than entries, even though I’ve fetched both to cache ahead of time. With this in mind, it takes ~90 min to fetch the entries for my large dataset, which would correspond to 15 hours for records
Add ability to copy records from a database on one server to a database on another server. It sounds like we don’t feel that this is a priority.
|
Old Issue of the Week | Fix Error Jobs in "OpenFF Group1 Torsions" TorsionDriveDataset Yudong Qiu requested an update to the dataset keywords to resolve an error. At the time of writing the issue there were 798 complete of 820. Today there are 810 complete, 4 errored, and 6 invalid. I propose we close with a comment containing the current status showing that the issue was resolved. Yes, closed
Bonus: Migrate Roche fragment set torsion drive input scripts here Resolved by PR86? Yes, closed
|
| |