2024-09-08 DM/MO/LW

Participants

  • Meghan Osato

  • @David Mobley

  • @Lily Wang

Goals

  • Sync on state of PL dataset inputs, records and output

  • Future plans on repo creation

Discussion topics

Item

Presenter

Notes

Item

Presenter

Notes

Need for recording PL input inputs

 

  • DM: needs

    • files, environment, details, etc, with version control

    • Should not live under MO

    • OpenFF best to look after it, but MO could contribute

  • LW: don’t want MO to spend significant effort or time on reformatting, just put it somewhere

  • MO: currently inputs are formatted the same way IAlibay formats his, so should be fairly standardized already

    • OpenFE already has PLB test systems as part of installed modules

    • LW: I think I’ve seen this before, sounds good

  • LW: are the inputs small enough to upload to GitHub?

    • MO: looks like for 2.1, it’s 11 MB

  • DM: suggests plan:

    • OpenFF creates repo, adds MO as maintainer, MO uploads data

  • LW: JW and I talked about qca-dataset-submission-style repo, but automation should happen later when things are more standardised

  • DM: Might be best to work in Zenodo when there’s a clear process – e.g. could see a future where for each FF release, we run benchmarks, and need to release benchmarks on Zenodo

  • MO: will this just be for F@H/Alchemiscale-type benchmarks?

    • LW: that’s what we were thinking

    • MO: should I go back to septop benchmarks?

    • DM: no

  • MO: IA has same files structure for 2.0 and 2.1 benchmark. I could potentially upload through my Google Drive link

    • DM: sounds like a good plan

  • DM: eventually we might ask MO to run some SFEs to validate OpenFE infrastructure

    • DM: potentially compare gmx and openfe energies on some small molecules







Action items

Decisions

Â