Meeting structure and agenda
Proposal: https://openforcefield.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OFFO/pages/198672620
Big picture – “ideal solutions” – creative brainstorming for science + infrastructure
Meeting notes: 2020-03-23 Roadmap meeting notes
Concrete plans
Force fields [45 minutes or less]
Feature specification for the next two small molecule force field releases
Essential features
Optional features
Feature specification for the first protein force field/release of first protein FF
(Simmerling plan – refit protein-specific torsions using data used in recent AMBER protein FFs, but with our bonds/angles/valence).
FF generation vs release – naming scheme clarification
Key infrastructure components for next 1 yr [2 hr or less]
Infrastructure overview [20 min or less]
Data management
Automated molecule submission
WBO support
Benchmarking dashboard/automated benchmarking
Python system object
…?
Prioritization of infrastructure [ 40 min or less ]
Details of infrastructure – define inputs and outputs, features, restrictions, timelines [1 hr or less]
Supporting science [1 hr or less?]
NIH planned roadmap:
Science topics:
FF optimization = chemical perception + properties + ForceBalance
ForceBalance vs Bayesian framework
Charges / Electrostatics
WBO parameter interpolation:
Basic science is in place
Someone needs to begin getting into FFs
Someone needs to push science forward
Benchmarking | Diagnostics – what do we have and what do we need?
QM data → conformers (geometries, energies, torsional fingerprint deviation (TFD), ligand scoring, etc)
Properties → feasibility study, data selection and curation
Protein-ligand --- Host-guest (proposal – use smaller HG systems for development of benchmarking framework, including analysis)
Biomolecule structural/energetic data (NIH grant planning)
Protein
DNA/RNA
Lipid
Other (sugars)
Convene our SAB to collect data. Maybe write a LiveCoMS article?
Dashboard – what data will be displayed?
QM level of theory – is it a settled thing or is another benchmarking study needed?
Hiring needs in next year
We have about 1 person/year off of NIH funds (maybe 1.5), after hires of Thompson/Dotson/Cerutti.
What missing expertise do we need?
Creation of OpenFF affiliates
Reward people who aren’t PIs who contribute:
e.g. How can Dennis Della Corte contribute (We discussed parametrization of radicals, or the development of additional tutorials).
He is also writing a grant for force field development for molten salts, which will fund a graduate student who has professional programming experience and can partly support the Dev-Ops aspects of OpenFF.