0303

1. Issue with amide cic-trans preference

Cis-trans preference is expressed as a one-fold cosine function in torsion term. To properly describe cis-trans preference of N-methyl acetamide, the k2 value(spring constant of one-fold cosine function. f(theta)= k1*(1+cos(2*theta-180)) + k2*(1+cos(1*theta))) of t70c([#1:1]-[#7X3:2]-!@[#6X3:3](=[#8,#16,#7:4])-[#6,#1]) seems to be around 1.5 kcal/mol.

Initial guess of the k2 is 2.0kcal/mol, which seems a pretty reasonable value, but it decreases during the fitting to QM amide torsional energy profiles. (in fitting v1.3.0)

2. test fitting (individually)

 

SMILES

cis E - trans E (kcal/mol)

t70c k2

AM1 WBO

 

SMILES

cis E - trans E (kcal/mol)

t70c k2

AM1 WBO

scan1

CC(=O)NC1=CNC=C1

2.0252

1.9056

1.0329

scan2

CC(=O)NC1=CC=CN1

3.8560

1.8408

1.0087

scan3

CC(=O)NC1=COC=C1

1.6432

1.8122

1.0185

scan4

CC(=O)NC1=CC=CO1

0.8685

1.2958

0.9979

scan5

CC(=O)NC1=CSC=C1

1.8339

1.7347

1.0224

scan6

CC(=O)NC1=CC=CS1

-0.2350

1.5908

1.0053

N-methyl acetamide

CC(=O)NC

1.9518

1.6562

1.0830

#95

CC(=O)Nc1[nH]ccn1

7.9196

1.9979

0.9788

#461

CC(=O)Nc1ccccn1

1.9692

2.0716

1.0355

#711

CC(=O)Nc1ccccn1

4.4138

1.8254

1.0015