Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Current »

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Item

Presenter

Notes

ToolkitAM1BCC (ELF1?) EP?

idifv ambiguity

JW – Matt and I recently realized that we understand the meaning of idivf="auto" differently, and that the SMIRNOFF spec doesn’t resolve which of our interpretations is correct. Matt opened an Issue summarizing the confusion. We should briefly discuss this at the next meeting to select a course of action. As a suggested course of action, Matt points out that we do not in practice make meaningful use of idivf="auto", and our current implementation will raise an error if it’s set to auto for proper torsions, so we could consider removing idivf from the spec altogether.

✅ Action items

  •  

⤴ Decisions

  • No labels

0 Comments

You are not logged in. Any changes you make will be marked as anonymous. You may want to Log In if you already have an account.