Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

September 20

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Item

Presenter

Notes

Alexandra McIsaac

CB on conformer filtering slide: Wondering if taking QM single points is the right thing to do here

BS: How do the fits change as you change the energy filters? Or do your filters change as the FF changes?

  • Filtering is done prior to fitting

BS: DDE can be confusing if the geometry changes significantly

DM: What about the all-by-all DDE energy comparison

CBy: 2 points:

  • Redundant molecules my be dominating the fit, not allowing bad molecules from being fixed

  • Adding a 1 kcal/A^2 might be helpful

BS: We found it helpful to only compare energies when the optimized RMSD was less than 0.4 A

BS: Looking at a smaller set would be good to try as CBy suggested


Pavan

DM: Curious how many times the molecules are exercised for each param

BS: Would be interesting to look at dipole to asses the elec. contribution

✅ Action items

  •  

⤴ Decisions

  • No labels

0 Comments

You are not logged in. Any changes you make will be marked as anonymous. You may want to Log In if you already have an account.