Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Item

Presenter

Notes

Representative poor relative conformer energy profiles in Genentech benchmarking with Sage 2.0.0

Bill Swope

Update on current status of charge projects

Lily Wang


water models, non-mainline FFs, and calendar versioning in openff-forcefields?

Matt Thompson (backup Jeff Wagner)

continuing from 2022-09-14 Meeting notes

  • Seems to be strong consensus for switching the repo “version” to “calendar versioning”, where releases are of the form 2022.09.14 instead of 2.0.0. The file names would remain unchanged (Sage = openff-2.0.0, Rosemary = openff-3.0.0, etc), but the git tags, python module, and conda packages would reflect the “calendar version” instead of the “force field version”.

  • How to version “ports” of external FFs/FFs whose reference implementations are defined elsewhere?

  • Would we want to add different ion models as well? Would we bundle them with compatible water parameters? How would we define compatible?

✅ Action items

  •  

⤴ Decisions

  • No labels

0 Comments

You are not logged in. Any changes you make will be marked as anonymous. You may want to Log In if you already have an account.