Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
Version 1
Next »
Date
Participants
Goals
Updates from team
Schrodinger pathway
Torsiondrive execution
Refactor wishlist
Discussion topics
Item | Presenter | Notes |
---|
Torsiondrive execution testing | Lorenzo | Seeing issues on Janssen cluster; appear random, consistent with network-filesystem latency failure modes Will try the approach taken for optimization benchmark; install conda env to each compute node local filesystem
|
Updates from team | | DH: ffbuilder runs even if no params directory already present now LD: could 2021 version work with this? DH: could work, might be issues; if folks use different versions of schrodinger, get different ffs in the background 2021 just used OPLS4, nothing else really different might consider changing the tag to include the OPLS version DD: is there an easy way to get the OPLS version out of the tools? Can then have opls-<version> and opls-<version>-custom ?
DH: short interactions with Bill, worked with Lorenzo on a tour of openff-benchmark repo, next steps with analysis
LD: starting to deal with analysis that Xavier, Bill requested got a tour of the existing analysis from DH, looking to make use of what we have to accommodate Xavier, Bill needs trying out torsiondrive executor, put testing results on Confluence testing classes of molecules known to be difficult for torsiondrives /wiki/spaces/~954728248/pages/1518010447 N(amide)-C(arom) rotatable bonds set, known to be difficult case for many FFs JW: interested in doing a working session at the end of this meeting if we can for identifying which torsion to drive DH: might need to consider kekulization too?
|
Schrodinger pathway
|
|
|
Action items
Decisions
0 Comments