Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Current »

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Item

Presenter

Notes

Filtering

MT

  • MT – Some loose end about why alkyne pattern hits different stuff than checkmol patterns. We could delve in but I don’t think it’s super significant.

  • LM – LGTM

Atom ordering bug

LM

  • LW – Will there be a problem if two “molecules” are added with different mapped smileses but identical inchis?

  • MT – In conformer array, each row is indexed by its atom ordering. I can’t say confidently though that there are safeguards in place to keep that bad state from happening. I should check this.

  • LW – May start happening as we start assembling/combining datasets. So should be a thing we check for the future.

  • MT – Good call, will add to trello.

Torsion datasets

MT

Good torsion dataset to pull from? Might filter out a subset of molecules for scale convenience. Right now I think we’re just storing OptimizationDatasets, but now I’ll need to start storing TorsionDriveDatasets. Should I expect to have Optimization and TorsionDrive data in the same store?

  • LW – I don’t think so. You can’t really do unconstrained opts wiht torsiondrives, since TDs need to be constrained/don’t like that.

  • LW – For dataset choice, the most recent supplement torsiondrive dataset is reasonably small. BW, are there any where the torsiondrive hasn’t finished a full scan?

General discussion

✅ Action items

  •  

⤴ Decisions

  • No labels