BP: No updates from me on hardware side. On software side I dug into qcsubmit to make it compatible with qcf-next, almost done with it except the torsiondrive, need testers. I took caching out of qcsubmit and put that on client side now. Two tests were broken, mostly because of pint dependency
DD: I don’t see any changes now?
BP: I have to push them yet.
DD: Thanks for working on this. Do you need any help with tests?
BP: Let me sort these out a bit more and then I can use your help.
DD: For qcf-next roll out do we need to do mocking exercises like setting up a test server, etc., as before?
BP: I don’t think it would help that much.
DD: I agree.
BP: There is a snowflake instance I am using to test though.
DD: Yeah, I use a similar thing for Fah-alchemy.
BP: Anyways, wait on the tests for a while but I think it is ready for users to give it a go.
DD: Josh Horton reached out to me recently and he can help with this.
JW: Yeah, DD since you are busy with Fah work I think it’s better to use JH and myself for qcsubmit on a timescale of a month or two.
DD: We’re getting close to the release of alchemiscale but it is still uncertain how my workload would be for the near future. But, I can lend a hand when we are close to deploying qcf-next.
Add Comment