Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Current »

Date

Participants

Discussion topics

Item

Notes

Tech support Qs

  • Swope – s99F case sensitivity

    • The previous fix will have handled the optimize execute pathway, but the server-based pathway will hit trouble in qcsubmit. JH will make a new release of this ASAP.

    • DD reproduced issue locally

    • JH is making a qcsubmit release for this now. This process will also require some changes to openff-benchmark, which DD will review and merge.

  • TF – Missing TFD entries

    • No follow up when files were requested

    • DD tried to reproduce locally, failed.

    • JW sees this issue when he does ethanol with one conformer

      • Is this because there’s just one conformer, or because there are no 4-heavy-atom torsions?

        • TF’s problem isn’t not the 4-heavy-atom thing

        • DD has some single-conformer molecules from his set, but tehy didn’t show this issue

        • We are unable to explain TF’s error and will need his files to debug.

  • Schindler QM keyword mismatch

    • Case-sensitive?

    • DD is checking

    • Solved – Needed to have matched_ in the method name

Feature requests

  • XL – Use ANI?

    • DD – No. Would substantially increase infrastructure complexity.

    • DD will reply on Slack

  • Coverage report segmentation?

    • JW – I am strongly against this. GT and DH are the “scientific owners” for the project, so they should make the call.

  • IC – Final report format?

Deployment decisions

  • Should we make a new release from master immediately?

    • Is b3lyp-d3bj case correct in all steps?

  • Change step numbering?

Action items

  •  

Decisions

  • No labels