Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

Participants

Goals

Discussion topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

15 mins

ICH fitting study update

Hyesu Jang


(will be updated soon)

15 mins

Virtual site and functional form (future plans)

Daniel Cole

  • DC gives update on experience/progress using virtual sites in QUBEKit and related infra (OpenMM, TorsionDrive, GeomeTRIC, ForceBalance)

    • Getting densities and Hvap, free energies in progress

  • DM - where does virtual site become important?

  • CIB - Divalent aromatic nitrogen ( pyridine type nitrogen), sigma hole on bromine and iodine, aromatic sulfur. But not sure about carbonyl oxygen, aliphatic amine(trivalent pyramidal nitrogen), sigma hole on chlorine

  • CIB - How to treat virtual site in torsions? same treatment as OpenMM does.

  • DM- OFF has general virtual site implemented - will be nice to synchronize later

  • CIB - placement of VS? DC - calculates bisector, and move along the bisector, with symmetry enforced.

  • DC - non-LJ functional forms touch a lot of infrastructure, how to best avoid huge infra changes?

  • SB - In long term, update SMIRNOFF specification, but in short term, you can plugin force field to the toolkit with custom parameter handler, without needing to update spec.

  • CB - would be nice if toolkit made it easy to rapidly test functional forms, i.e. just by changing the header

  • SB - could have a “only works with OpenMM” implementation (perhaps not immediately part of the public API) that allows user to specify the functional form that would later be passed into OpenMM’s CustomNonbondedForce

  • SB - target property?

  • DC - condensed phase property to protein-ligand binding

  • CB - of the options for funcitonal forms, the 3 things that people care about are the well, replusion, and core, but we only care about the well and repulsion, and these are hard to get right with only 3 DOF (sig & eps in LJ). The 12 term isn’t great, would like something like gaussian + 6 + something else. Thinks we do need 3 DOF to get condensed phase properties + sterics right, skeptical that the common potentials (exp-6, exp-8-6, 12-8-6, 12-6-4, etc.) are the best possible functional forms. Practical idea: explore gaussian as the repulsive part. LPW & MRS might have something to add on this topic

  • SB + JH will sync up on putting together a plugin (probably standalone Python package) for using non-LJ functional forms with current infra

  • CB - Say we want to add a VS to a trivalent pyrimidal nitrogen. This group inverts itself quickly, and has several intermediate states that may be typed differently, other complications like stereochemistry are issues

    • TrivalentLonePair in SMIRNOFF spec is one idea for this problem, with the distance d going up and down during inversion

Action items

  •  

Decisions