1. Tracing the origin of the amide issue
...
One easy fix of the problem is using simple targets, whose torsion profiles have parabolic shape near the minimum (planar geometry at the minimum). + Expecting that this experiment to be one proof of the need for using simple-as-possible torsiondrive targets in general torsion parameter fitting.
2. Filtering out non-planar structures at the minimum geometry
...
v1.2.0 | fb-fit2 (scheme 2) | fb-fit3 (scheme3) | fb-fit4 (scheme 4) | non-filtered Unfiltered | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
test cal 1 | 144.59 | 91.81 | 82.39 | 88.84 | - |
test cal 2 | 25.37 | 15.62 | 14.75 | 14.15 | 23.21 |
test cal 2-1 simple | 7.10 | 6.21 | 7.49 | 8.29 | 11.04 |
test cal 2-2 complex | 18.26 | 9.40 | 7.26 | 6.87 | 12.17 |
final X2 (fitting) | - | 1.31e+02 → 2.22e+01 | 1.30e+02 → 1.73e+01 | 2.09e+02 → 3.01e+01 | 5.28e+02 → 6.90e+01 |
(1) N-methylacetamide
...
(2) Test set 1 (N-methyacetamide, non-planar molecules in the 1st gen. Roche torsion set)
...
ID, SMIRKS | Initial guess | fb-fit2 | fb-fit3 | fb-fit4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| k1 = 2.5 | k1= 1.6793e+0 | k1 = 1.3647e+0 | k1 = 1.7786e+0 |
| k1 = 3.4592e+0 k2 = 1.3570e+0 (from 1.2.0) | k1 = 3.5662e-1 k2 =1.3542e+0 | k1 = 2.4868e-1 K2 = 9.4280e-1 | k1 = -1.3577e+0 k2 = 1.2663e+0 |
| k1 = 2.5 | k1 = 4.1692e+0 | k1 = 4.4151e+0 | k1 = 4.1071e+0 |
| k1 = 2.5 k2 = 2.0 | k1 = 1.2406e+0 k2 = 9.0656e-1 | k1 = 1.5283e+0 k2 = 7.3406e-1 | k1 = 1.1159e+0 k2 = 7.6465e-1 |
| k1 = 2.5 | k1= 1.3031e+0 | k1 = 1.6149e+0 | k1 = 1.1680e+0 |
...
Although the k1 value for t70a seems unphysical, the result below shows the plots got improved after the optimization. checked improvement for all of the four fitting targets.
...
4. Conclusions
* Fitting torsion parameters to simpler torsion targets (with less + Selecting simple geometries (no strong electrostatic interaction) might be needed for the next round fittingmay need to be considered in the next torsion training dataset selection procedure.