Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

September 20

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

Trevor Gokey

Alexandra McIsaac

Brent Westbrook

Christopher Bayly

Bill Swope

David Mobley

Pavan Behara

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Trevor Gokey

Item

Presenter

Notes

Alexandra McIsaac

View file
nameconformer_filters.pptx

CB on conformer filtering slide: Wondering if taking QM single points is the right thing to do here

BS: How do the fits change as you change the energy filters? Or do your filters change as the FF changes?

  • Filtering is done prior to fitting

BS: DDE can be confusing if the geometry changes significantly

DM: What about the all-by-all DDE energy comparison

CBy: 2 points:

  • Redundant molecules my be dominating the fit, not allowing bad molecules from being fixed

  • Adding a 1 kcal/A^2 might be helpful

BS: We found it helpful to only compare energies when the optimized RMSD was less than 0.4 A

BS: Looking at a smaller set would be good to try as CBy suggested


Pavan

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/13cr5q5NzCLih_5znZtcGUk-0ryFeaZcWblMvLN6wc4o/edit?usp=sharing

DM: Curious how many times the molecules are exercised for each param

BS: Would be interesting to look at dipole to asses the elec. contribution

✅ Action items

  •  

⤴ Decisions