Item | Presenter | Notes |
---|
Folding@Home? | Ben | Ben: if we can do compression of output well, might be able to support David: I’ll start the PR for INCOMPLETE restarts David: I’m interested in Folding@Home for QCA if: the business case is there (we get something we don’t have already, but really want, and have the resources to spend developing that compute pathway) it fits into the stated mission of Folding@Home
|
Local testing for server development
| Ben
| |
QCSubmit ignore_errors | Josh | |
Docker deployments now up | David | |
Galileo | Josh, Jeff | Josh: need Docker image for server, worker separately Jeff: Mainly want to pursue this pathway for folks that want to run the bespoke workflow entirely on a stack they control David, Jeff: let’s put the Dockerfile for the server, specialized workers in the bespoke-workflow repo; images pushed to openforcefield Dockerhub org
|
New compute | Trevor | New workers spun up on two new resources David: Perhaps rename prp slack channel to fractal-compute for current status? Jeff: Should try and be two-deep on each machine if possible; need a contact besides John for Lilac
|
Precomputed datasets | Jeff, Ben, Josh | Jeff: are there paths for precomputed data to get into QCA? Ben: yes, we’re doing that for example with the ANI folks
|
Infrastructure Roadmap | Jeff | Jeff: please make changes to our working infrastructure roadmap as you see fit: Infrastructure Roadmap 2020 (working version) We want to make sure folks are able to work on something that aligns with their interests, and that they get recognized for it
|
PCM | Josh | |
ESP | Josh | |
Disaccharides | David, Josh, Jeff | |
Dataset standards | Trevor, Jeff, David | Trevor: adding more detailed field requirements for submissions Trevor: Major version tied to STANDARDS version Control new names - we should be able to do this Major version tied to STANDARDS version Need to communicate molecule info in the name Jeff: use a date for the name? David: This is an important effort, and Trevor is empowered to draft this as he sees fit could be worthwhile to draft 3 or so questions, responses to which would be informative, that can be sent to individuals in the org. Responses to these questions can then inform the approaches taken. Different folks may have different needs from e.g. the versioning/naming scheme
|