Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Participants

Goals

Discussion topics

...

Time

...

Item

...

Presenter

...

Item

Notes

Update

  • JH – QC submission and pull-down is mostly in

  • JH – When you do calculations in QCEngine, you use the QCSchema. For MM scans, we can fill in CMILES as an extra data field. But it’s trouble when we’ve ALREADY submitted a molecule for QM, and then we want to do MM, since we can’t modify the already-existing molecule.

  • Mobley will contact Thompson and Hahn to coordinate a time to set up MM energy calculation environments

  • HX – We looked into connectivity rearrangements and found it to be in roughly 10 in several thousands

  • JW – We should have an exmaple fo doign this filtering in QCSubmit examples

  • DM – We may have an especially nasty dataset because we enumerate tautomers.

  • HX – Where can we get these tools?

    • JH –

      Github link macro
      linkhttps://github.com/openforcefield/qcsubmit

  • HX – We’re interested in trying out virtualsites as well

  • DM – We’ll support virtualsites soon. Any suggestions on where to put them?

  • HX – We’ll publish our initial findings in September.

  • JH – Are virtualsites fit to molecular ESP? Gas phase ESP?

  • HX – Yes, not gas phase yet, but we may introduce a scaling factor

  • … discussion about gas phase qm and fitting …

  • HX – Using OpenFF data for most properties, HVap from CRC handbooks, about 1000 data points.

  • Relevant links to physical property fitting:



Action items

  •  

Decisions