Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Participants

Goals

Discussion topics

Item

Notes

The major goal of this meering will be to identify the next datasets to submit, and at what priority

  • Chaya – Torsion drives – For submission immediately

  • Hyesu – Benchmark set (After may meeting)

  • Maat – Nothing now

  • CS – Did we decide on a level of theory for charged mols?

    • HJ – No, that benchmark is planned for after the May meeting

    • CS – Could use our standard level of theory and review results

    • BP – B3LYP-D3DJ method w/ DZVP basis set should be reasonable

    • CS – I’d previously done some charged molecules, and the results weren’t so bad

    • (General) – Current method should be fine for charged mols, though we’ll want to do a more thorough benchmark later

  • Should we deprioritize 1.2.0 dataset?

    • (General) – Not yet

Getting Dotson started on QCA job maintenance

  • BP and DD will coordinate to meet and transfer knowledge later this week

With any additional time, we will cover the normal topics:

  1. Get updates from MolSSI

  2. Perform manager maintenance if needed

  3. Work on QCF integration into relevant code

  • JM – Improving naming scheme for training datasets. It’s difficult when one dataset has multiple names. We should have a discussion about how to do this.

    • HJ – Would also be interested in being part of this conversation.

  • TG – Is there a way to figure out if a single molecule appears in multiple datasets?

    • BP – This is currently internal data. May be hard to implement support for this.

    • DD – This might be a single JOIN in the backend database. TG, you should submit a feature request to QCFractal repo.

...