PB: Just for information, there is a user question about weird energies with psi4, it seems to be a threading issue with in-core algorithm calculations,
Github link macro |
---|
link | https://github.com/openmm/spice-dataset/issues/60 |
---|
|
Github link macro |
---|
link | https://github.com/psi4/psi4/issues/2279 |
---|
|
PB – I can’t reproduce the submitted issue, but it looks ilke psi4 can be erratic. The QC records show some conformer single point energies computer by UCI cluster being 20-30 hartrees lower than other confs.
DD – Which psi4 was the compute using?
DD – How many records show this?
JW – Is it possible that the optimization led to a different final geometry in these?
DD – Who is spice set owner?
PB – I’ll reply that we’re looking into the issue and that it seems to be rooted in psi4.
DD – We now have SPICE sets listed on ML datasets on QCA webapp, but I have questions about how to fill in metadata.