Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Meeting recording - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1O95PtHDVBn3T1FT7FvFHEt5yqhSrRraX/view?usp=sharing

Item

Presenter

Notes

Relative conformer energies in the public dataset

Bill Swope, Alberto Gobbi, Ben Sellers

  • (Slides to be uploaded)

  • LW – happy to re-do scripts in Python, or work with Bill to do so

  • DM: are you happy to look more into this and identify specific functional groups, problematic chemistries, etc.? e.g. using tools like checkmol

    • DM: might bring this up with Lorenzo

    • WS: e.g. splitting broad parameters into multiple specific ones?

  • WS: what goes into the forcebalance training objectives? Do you have multiple conformers per molecule?

    • PB: yes

    • WS: and using the Hessian?

    • PB: not in Sage – included in Parsley

  • WS: Alberto noticed problems with ring conformers, thought it might have something to do with overly stiff angle parameters

    • DM: ring parameters have some problems – philosophy was to let geometry sort it out, which results in alright structures, but energy issues

    • DM: would be helpful to pinpoint if that was an issue, ring parameters haven’t had a lot of attention so far, could be more specific

  • WS: different problem molecules seem to have different interactions/problems

    • DM: Lorenzo’s been looking at overrepresented parameters in problem molecules – should probably repeat on molecules identified by Genentech’s analysis

    • DM: typically bad params fall into two camps:

      • too broad, or

      • trained to different chemistry to which it’s used

  • WS: happy to work with OpenFF and keep helping

    • DM: will work out good pathways internally

  • General – get back to us in a month

✅ Action items

  •  

⤴ Decisions

...