Time | Item | Presenter | Notes |
---|
15 mins | Bespokefit smirks bug | Joshua Horton | BespokeFit SMIRKS generation DC – Is there some way to check/raise an error if a torsion doesn’t map back to the parent? SB – I was wondering if there’s a way to use the mapping to do this check? JH – I’m using chemper to make cluster graphs/MCSS to map back to the parents. SB – This sounds good. JH – The fragmenter fragments should be able to map abck to the parents. I think there’s an edge case in here, but I’m working on
AV – Since you’re mapping every fragment back to the parent, will this add significatnly to computational cost? JH – It’s pretty quick right now, but it may get more expensive as they get more complex. DM – If we look at large libraries of molecules, or large polymers, then the computational cost may become significant JH – The underlying cost here is MCSS using RDKit
AV – We’re running a large benchmark right now, so we’ll see whether this problem manifests. I should be able to share this, but the timeline is uncertain since someone else is running it. DC – We’re planning on running the Schrodinger JACS set, does that overlap with AV’s set? AV – We’re looking at molecules that are neutral and ANI-compatible. I’m not sure whether there will be overlap. DC – Did the ANI torsion scans complete? AV – Yes, though I’ve noticed that sometimes the fitting doesn’t complete properly. But sometimes we have to rerun the geometry optimization. So I’m not sure how to automatically detect the cases that require a re-run. I’ll be looking into this.
|
15 mins
| Thoughts on Executor refactor
| Simon Boothroyd
| |
10 mins | Meaning of negative force constants | Daniel Cole Mateusz Bieniek | MB will post link to slides herehttps://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1oBGYM95Fnb0spjVLmIZ4aHw14SGbP3YF-mRwbuQXNAM/edit#slide=id.ge5e6fa3bf3_0_0 DC – MB has downloaded data from QCArchive and is feeding them into espaloma. Things look promising so far, and I’ll talk about that separately. But, we’re seeing negative bond k’s in mostly when fitting using the modified seminario method, mostly in nitrogen-oxygen bonds DC – I’m not sure how to interpret this. I found a paper on this that explained that a negative force constant in a ring can actually improve geometries. For example, in molecule below, the 2.2 A bond seen below in MM reached a length of 1.6A in QM DM – How severe is this? We’ll probably want to address this before we try to publish anything, and we can bring in Chris Bayly PB – Did we use modified seminario in fitting sage? DC – SB, could new data + the espaloma stuff go into a new paper?
|